Valuation can be critical when determining whether the Small Business CGT Concessions are available.
The recent Kilgour v Commissioner of Taxation decision provides an important example.
In 2016, all of the shares in Punters Paradise Pty Ltd were sold to News Corp for approximately $31 million.
The shares were held by three corporate trustees for three trusts. One held a 60% interest, while the other two each held a 20% interest.
The two 20% shareholders each received approximately $6.21 million for their respective shareholdings.
This was significant because the market value of the shares was critical to determining whether the relevant $6 million Maximum Net Asset Value Test could be satisfied.
Could the 20% interests be worth less?
The taxpayers argued that their individual 20% shareholdings should be valued separately from the overall sale of the company.
Expert valuation evidence put each 20% interest at substantially less than the amount actually received and argued that part of the price paid by News Corp reflected strategic or synergistic value.
The Full Federal Court rejected the taxpayers' appeal.
A particularly important aspect of the decision was that the minority shareholdings were not being sold in isolation.
All three shareholders had decided to sell, cooperated in the sale process and offered 100% of the company to a single purchaser.
The Court considered that commercial reality relevant when determining the market value of each shareholding.
What does this mean for business owners?
The case does not establish that the actual sale price will always automatically equal market value.
However, an actual arm's-length transaction — particularly one occurring at or very close to the valuation time — can provide strong evidence of market value.
It also shows that a minority shareholding cannot necessarily be valued as though it were being sold independently where, in reality, it forms part of a coordinated sale of the entire company.
For Small Business CGT Concession purposes, that distinction can be significant where the value of the shares is material to whether the $6 million Maximum Net Asset Value Test is satisfied.
Don't leave valuation until after the deal
Business owners should not assume that a minority discount or theoretical standalone valuation will necessarily determine their Division 152 position.
The actual sale process, the willingness of shareholders to sell together, the purchaser market and the commercial circumstances surrounding the transaction can all affect the valuation analysis.
Where eligibility for the Small Business CGT Concessions depends on valuation, the position should be reviewed carefully before the sale transaction is locked in.
General information only. Eligibility for the Small Business CGT Concessions, including the application of the Maximum Net Asset Value Test and market value principles, depends on the specific facts and circumstances and the detailed requirements of Division 152 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997. Professional advice should be obtained before relying on any valuation or entering into a business sale.
Stay Ahead with Business & Tax Insights
Receive practical business insights, taxation updates and strategic guidance delivered directly to your inbox. Stay informed about legislative changes, emerging opportunities and practical strategies to help you structure, grow and protect your business.

Related Insights
Explore more articles, updates and case studies related to this topic.



